{"id":29333,"date":"2011-02-14T10:43:00","date_gmt":"2011-02-14T10:43:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2020-09-25T09:54:51","modified_gmt":"2020-09-25T09:54:51","slug":"rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii."},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>
\nAplicarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een faza judiciar\u0103 a procesului penal creeaz\u0103 condi\u0163ii favorabile pentru stabilirea adev\u0103rului \u00een cauza penal\u0103 \u015fi emiterea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti juste \u015fi echitabile. Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere valorile umane supreme care sunt implicate \u00een procesul penal, societatea trebuie s\u0103 pledeze pentru respectarea principiilor fundamentale ale procesului penal \u00een special la faza judiciar\u0103. Dealtfel, dac\u0103 persoana inculpat\u0103 nu va atrage aten\u0163ia instan\u0163ei asupra neregulilor ce s-au produs, ea risc\u0103 s\u0103 nu mai aib\u0103 posibilitatea aceasta ulterior.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Despre importan\u0163a contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii la faza judec\u0103rii cauzei s-a con\u015ftientizat \u015fi \u00een perioada sovietic\u0103, despre care am expus mai sus, c\u0103 nu era tocmai dispus\u0103 s\u0103 respecte drepturile fundamentale ale omului. Astfel, art.215 din CPP al RSSM declara expres c\u0103: \u201eAcuzatorul, inculpatul, ap\u0103r\u0103torul, precum \u015fi partea v\u0103t\u0103mat\u0103, partea civil\u0103, partea civilmente responsabil\u0103 \u015fi reprezentan\u0163ii lor se bucur\u0103 de drepturi egale \u00een fa\u0163a judec\u0103\u0163ii \u00een ce prive\u015fte administrarea probelor, participarea la examinarea acestora \u015fi formularea cererilor.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            De\u015fi noul Cod de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 nume\u015fte art.314: \u201eNemijlocirea, verbalitatea \u015fi contradictorialitatea judec\u0103rii cauzei\u201d. \u00cen con\u0163inutul acestui articol se descriu cerin\u0163ele de nemijlocire a examin\u0103rii cauzei (alin.(1) art. 314 CPP). Referitor la contradictorialitate nu se expune aproape nimic, cu excep\u0163ia alin.(2) al aceluia\u015fi articol, care stipuleaz\u0103 c\u0103 instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103, la judecarea cauzei, creeaz\u0103 p\u0103r\u0163ii acuz\u0103rii \u015fi p\u0103r\u0163ii ap\u0103r\u0103rii condi\u0163iile necesare pentru cercetarea multilateral\u0103 \u015fi \u00een deplin\u0103 m\u0103sur\u0103 a circumstan\u0163elor cauzei. Aceast\u0103 prevedere legal\u0103, \u00een opinia noastr\u0103, este o cerin\u0163\u0103 mai mult tehnic\u0103 \u015fi nu una care se refer\u0103 nemijlocit la contradictorialitate. Ceea ce ar \u00eensemna c\u0103, ea va ajuta indirect la realizarea contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii la faza judec\u0103rii cauzei.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            O alt\u0103 observa\u0163ie se refer\u0103 la faptul c\u0103 art.315 din CPP al RM se refer\u0103 la egalitatea \u00een drepturi a p\u0103r\u0163ilor \u00een fa\u0163a instan\u0163ei. Consider\u0103m c\u0103 ar fi mult mai oportun ca anume aici s\u0103 fie inserat\u0103 \u015fi norma care se refer\u0103 la contradictorialitate \u00een faza judec\u0103rii cauzei.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Propunem s\u0103 fie modificate art.art.314 \u015fi 315 ale Codului de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 \u00een felul urm\u0103tor:<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            1. Art.314 CPP s\u0103 fie \u00eentitulat \u201cNemijlocirea \u015fi verbalitatea judec\u0103rii cauzei\u201d.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            2. Art.315 CPP  s\u0103 fie \u00eentitulat: \u201eContradictorialitatea \u015fi egalitatea \u00een drepturi a p\u0103r\u0163ilor \u00een fa\u0163a instan\u0163ei\u201d. La fel alin.(2) al art.314 CPP s\u0103 fie inserat ca alin.(2) al art.315 CPP.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Dup\u0103 cum am men\u0163ionat, respectarea contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii la etapa judiciar\u0103, creeaz\u0103 condi\u0163ii favorabile pentru stabilirea adev\u0103rului \u00een cauza penal\u0103. La aceast\u0103 afirma\u0163ie \u015fi la argumentarea sa ne vom referi \u00een cele ce urmeaz\u0103.<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Problema stabilirii adev\u0103rului \u00een cauza penal\u0103 implic\u0103 examinarea mai multor categorii juridice conexe:<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            1. Problema adev\u0103rului;<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            2. Criteriile de stabilire a adev\u0103rului;<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            3. Intima convingere;<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            4. Interpretarea dubiilor ap\u0103rute \u00een examinarea cauzei;<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            5. Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la stabilirea adev\u0103rului.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Dup\u0103 opinia unor autori, categoria a cincea le include \u00een sfera sa pe toate celelalte [40, pag.72].<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Problema adev\u0103rului este una dintre cele mai vechi probleme ale gnoseologiei. Cu toate acestea, filozofia nici p\u00e2n\u0103 ast\u0103zi nu a elaborat o concep\u0163ie unic\u0103 a categoriei de \u201eadev\u0103r\u201d. De cele mai multe ori adev\u0103rul filozofic este diferit \u00een \u201ecorespunderea a cuno\u015ftin\u0163elor cu realitatea\u201d [62, pag.45].<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            S\u0103 nu par\u0103 c\u0103 aceste informa\u0163ii sunt str\u0103ine dreptului procesual penal, problema adev\u0103rului are str\u00e2nse leg\u0103turi cu procesul penal.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Legisla\u0163ia procesual penal\u0103 din perioada sovietic\u0103 con\u0163inea multe referiri la termenul \u201eadev\u0103r\u201d, \u00eens\u0103 nu-l definea. \u00cen aceast\u0103 perioad\u0103, mul\u0163i autori considerau c\u0103 adev\u0103rul stabilit \u00een instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103 era un adev\u0103r obiectiv. Cu at\u00e2t mai mult c\u0103 exista cerin\u0163a categoric\u0103 ca \u00een orice cauz\u0103 penal\u0103 s\u0103 fie stabilit adev\u0103rul obiectiv. Aceste imperative ale timpului au fost comb\u0103tute \u00eenc\u0103 atunci prin rezultatele practicii, dar se prefera a ascunde asemenea concluzii, dec\u00e2t s\u0103 se caute unele solu\u0163ii adev\u0103rate.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Noi nu neg\u0103m posibilitatea descoperirii adev\u0103rului obiectiv \u00een cadrul procesului penal, \u00eens\u0103 a obliga organele de drept s\u0103 descopere adev\u0103rul obiectiv este un nonsens, deoarece deseori adev\u0103rul obiectiv nu va putea fi dovedit din cauze independente de voin\u0163a organelor respective. Spre exemplu, infractorul  a distrus absolut toate probele existente \u00een cauz\u0103 \u015fi astfel este imposibil de a stabili adev\u0103rul.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Organele de resort trebuie s\u0103 fie obligate s\u0103 ac\u0163ioneze \u00een scopul stabilirii adev\u0103rului. Adic\u0103, atingerea scopului ca atare nu trebuie s\u0103 fie impus\u0103 ca o obliga\u0163ie organelor competente. Cerin\u0163a de stabilire a adev\u0103rului se impune ca cerin\u0163\u0103 a procesului \u015fi nu ca cerin\u0163\u0103 final\u0103.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Criteriile de stabilire a adev\u0103rului sunt subiective. De regul\u0103, faptele cercetate \u00een cadrul procesului penal, sunt determinate ca adev\u0103rate sau false prin intermediul proba\u0163iunii. S\u0103 nu uit\u0103m c\u0103 acelea\u015fi ac\u0163iuni \u015fi acelea\u015fi fapte vor fi apreciate de c\u0103tre diferi\u0163i subiec\u0163i diferit. Anume \u00een aceasta \u015fi const\u0103 intima convingere.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            \u00cen practic\u0103 aceste ra\u0163ionamente se aplic\u0103 \u00een modul urm\u0103tor: organul de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 examineaz\u0103 circumstan\u0163ele cauzei \u015fi \u00ee\u015fi formeaz\u0103 anumite concluzii \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu cauza. Anume pozi\u0163ia sa \u015fi-o va expune argumentat \u00een cadrul examin\u0103rii cauzei \u00een instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103. Acela\u015fi lucru \u00eel va face \u015fi ap\u0103r\u0103torul.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Dar s\u0103 nu uit\u0103m c\u0103 instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103 este independent\u0103 de orice concluzie a acestora. Ea va face cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 cu materialele cauzei \u015fi va emite o hot\u0103r\u00e2re dup\u0103 propria sa intima convingere. Anume acesta este mecanismul intern de realizare a contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een procesul penal.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Mecanismul prezentat este unul foarte simplist, dar omniprezent, \u00een caz c\u0103 instan\u0163a \u00eentr-adev\u0103r are rol diriguitor, iar principiul contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii se respect\u0103.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Ne pare interesant\u0103 opinia conform c\u0103reia scopul procesului penal este de a stabili adev\u0103rul procesual (mai ales c\u00e2nd justi\u0163ia penal\u0103 se efectueaz\u0103 de cur\u0163ile cu jura\u0163i). Adev\u0103rul procesual este suprapunerea adev\u0103rului obiectiv cu cel care este dedus din \u00eens\u0103\u015fi procesul penal \u00een urma cercet\u0103rii circumstan\u0163elor faptei. Aceasta ar contribui la excluderea cazurilor de falsificare a probelor, de denun\u0163uri minciunoase \u015fi autocalomnieri [94, pag.19].<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            \u00cen acest context se mai impune o \u00eentrebare: \u00een ce mod instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103 poate fi impus\u0103 s\u0103 stabileasc\u0103 adev\u0103rul \u00een cadrul examin\u0103rii cauzei [94, pag.20]. R\u0103spunsul vine de la sine: Instan\u0163a este obligat\u0103 s\u0103 emit\u0103 hot\u0103r\u00e2rea judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 care trebuie s\u0103 fie: legal\u0103, \u00eentemeiat\u0103 \u015fi motivat\u0103 (art.384 CPP al R.M.).<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Judec\u0103torul, apreciind circumstan\u0163ele cauzei, nu trebuie s\u0103 se refere la verosimilitatea sau neverosimilitatea lor. El trebuie s\u0103 aprecieze veridicitatea acestora reie\u015find din probele anexate. Nici o hot\u0103r\u00e2re judec\u0103toreasc\u0103 \u00een cauze penale (\u015fi civile bine\u00een\u0163eles) nu se poate baza pe presupuneri. Orice dubii se interpreteaz\u0103 \u00een favoarea celui \u00eenvinuit (art.8 CPP al RM).<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            De vreme ce am stabilit condi\u0163iile \u015fi cerin\u0163ele fa\u0163\u0103 de adev\u0103rul stabilit \u00een instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103, \u00een cele ce urmeaz\u0103 ne vom referi la pozi\u0163ia (rolul) instan\u0163ei \u00een cadrul procesului. De fapt, rolul instan\u0163ei \u00een cadrul procesului ajut\u0103 la determinarea naturii contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii acelui proces.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Opinii referitor la pozi\u0163ia instan\u0163ei \u00een cadrul unui proces contradictorial exist\u0103 dintre cele mai diverse.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Unii autorii care sus\u0163in prevederile sovietice consider\u0103 c\u0103 rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la proba\u0163iune este minim, sau chiar nu exist\u0103 [38, pag.58].<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Al\u0163ii men\u0163ioneaz\u0103 c\u0103 rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 \u00een proces este pur formal \u015fi se rezum\u0103 la audierea pozi\u0163iei p\u0103r\u0163ilor [100, pag.66].<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Pe c\u00e2nd autorii postsovietici insist\u0103 asupra rolului activ al instan\u0163ei (adic\u0103, aceasta din urm\u0103, trebuie s\u0103 culeag\u0103 \u015fi s\u0103 prezinte probe) chiar \u015fi \u00een procesul contradictorial. Aceast\u0103 opinie este argumentat\u0103 prin aceea c\u0103 pasivitatea instan\u0163ei \u00eenr\u0103ut\u0103\u0163e\u015fte \u015fi mai mult situa\u0163ia inculpatului, care are o egalitate doar formal\u0103 cu acuzarea. Acest ultim argument nu este alogic pentru situa\u0163ia real-existent\u0103 dar este unul extremal.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Literatura rus\u0103 de specialitate consider\u0103 c\u0103 garantul realiz\u0103rii contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een procesul penal este rolul activ al instan\u0163ei. Aceasta reiese \u015fi din legisla\u0163ia lor procesual\u0103 penal\u0103 [56, pag.72].<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            \u00cen doctrin\u0103 \u00een contextul analiz\u0103rii acestei probleme se men\u0163ioneaz\u0103 despre:<\/span><\/div>\n
\n1. Contradictorialitatea de tip continental. \u00cen cadrul acesteia instan\u0163a are rol activ. Se practic\u0103 \u00een Germania, Fran\u0163a, Federa\u0163ia Rus\u0103 [54, pag.47];<\/span><\/div>\n
\n2. Contradictorialitatea de tip anglo-saxon. \u00cen cadrul acesteia instan\u0163a joac\u0103 rolul unui \u201earbitru impar\u0163ial\u201d. Instan\u0163a este pus\u0103 s\u0103 observe dac\u0103 sunt respectate regulile de joc \u015fi s\u0103 decid\u0103 a cui este victoria [38, pag.61]. <\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 consacrat de legisla\u0163ia noastr\u0103 este unul pasiv, apropiat de al doilea model expus mai sus.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Argument\u0103m aceast\u0103 afirma\u0163ie prin prevederile legale \u015fi anume:<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            1. Art.24 CPP al R.M. prevede \u00een alin.(2) c\u0103 “instan\u0163a judec\u0103toreasc\u0103… nu se manifest\u0103 \u00een favoarea acuz\u0103rii sau a ap\u0103r\u0103rii \u015fi nu exprim\u0103 alte interese dec\u00e2t interesele legii”. Astfel, instan\u0163a este nep\u0103rtinitoare. Dac\u0103 instan\u0163a ar avea atribu\u0163ia activ\u0103 de a culege probe, atunci ea neap\u0103rat se va manifesta \u00een favoarea acuz\u0103rii sau ap\u0103r\u0103rii, deoarece probele pot fi \u00een acuzare sau ap\u0103rare – \u201etertio non datur\u201d.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            2. Art.26 CPP al R.M. prevede c\u0103 judec\u0103torul judec\u0103 materialele \u015fi cauzele penale conform legii \u015fi propriei convingeri bazate pe probele cercetate \u00een procedura judiciar\u0103 respectiv\u0103. A\u015fadar, reiese c\u0103 instan\u0163a va reie\u015fi din probele care sunt prezentate de c\u0103tre p\u0103r\u0163i. Stabilirea adev\u0103rului va depinde de abilitatea p\u0103r\u0163ii acuz\u0103rii \u015fi ap\u0103r\u0103rii \u00een administrarea probelor. Acela\u015fi lucru este confirmat \u015fi de art.314(alin.1) CPP al R. Moldova.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            O singur\u0103 problem\u0103 se impune aici – am men\u0163ionat deja c\u0103 legea nu ofer\u0103 posibilit\u0103\u0163i egale reale de administrare a probelor. De aceea exagerarea pasivit\u0103\u0163ii instan\u0163ei poate duce la \u00eenc\u0103lcarea altor valori juridice cum este dreptul la ap\u0103rare, spre exemplu.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            3. Pasivitatea instan\u0163ei \u00een procesul penal al Republicii Moldova se manifest\u0103 \u015fi prin aceea c\u0103 judecarea cauzei \u00een prim\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103 se efectua numai \u00een privin\u0163a persoanei puse sub \u00eenvinuire \u015fi numai \u00een limitele \u00eenvinuirii formulate \u00een rechizitoriu. Modificarea \u00eenvinuirii se permite doar \u00een sensul atenu\u0103rii sale. Ca excep\u0163ie, \u00eenvinuirea va fi modificat\u0103 \u00een sensul agrav\u0103rii sale doar \u00een condi\u0163iile legii (art.326 CPP al R.M.).<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Astfel, instan\u0163a \u00een nici un caz nu va putea dep\u0103\u015fi limitele \u00eenvinuirii formulate de acuz\u0103ri. Aceast\u0103 norm\u0103 \u00eei ofer\u0103 inculpatului o anumit\u0103 siguran\u0163\u0103, precum \u015fi \u00eei permite s\u0103-\u015fi preg\u0103teasc\u0103 adecvat ap\u0103rarea.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Consider\u0103m c\u0103 prin cele expuse rolul pasiv al instan\u0163ei este demonstrat.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Trebuie s\u0103 ne referim \u00een acest context \u015fi la rolul diriguitor al instan\u0163ei la judecarea cauzei.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Rolul diriguitor al instan\u0163ei se manifest\u0103 prin:<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            1. Crearea de condi\u0163ii necesare p\u0103r\u0163ilor pentru cercetarea multilateral\u0103 \u015fi \u00een deplin\u0103 m\u0103sur\u0103 a circumstan\u0163elor cauzei (art.314 CPP al R.M., alin.(2).<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            2. Asigurarea legalit\u0103\u0163ii \u015fi ordinii \u00een \u015fedin\u0163a de judecat\u0103 (art.art.7, 17, 317 CPP). Instan\u0163a supravegheaz\u0103 respectarea procedurii. Instan\u0163a poate lua m\u0103suri fa\u0163\u0103 de persoanele care \u00eempiedic\u0103 desf\u0103\u015furarea normal\u0103 a procesului penal.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            3. Instan\u0163a este unica autoritate care este \u00een stare (\u00een virtutea legii, de sigur) s\u0103 solu\u0163ioneze cauza penal\u0103 (art.25 CPP).<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            4. Instan\u0163a poate contribui la ob\u0163inerea unor probe prin intermediul comisiilor rogatorii sau delega\u0163ii judiciare. La fel instan\u0163a poate \u00eenainta demersuri fa\u0163\u0103 de persoanele fizice \u015fi juridice care de\u0163in anumite probe spre a le prezenta. Aceste demersuri se efectueaz\u0103 de c\u0103tre instan\u0163\u0103 la ini\u0163iativa p\u0103r\u0163ilor (art.157 CPP al RM).<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Chiar dac\u0103 la prima vedere s-ar p\u0103rea c\u0103 este vorba despre rolul activ al instan\u0163ei, spunem ferm c\u0103 aceste activit\u0103\u0163i au ca scop facilitarea desf\u0103\u015fur\u0103rii procesului, adic\u0103 instan\u0163a execut\u0103 activit\u0103\u0163i organizatorice care corespund \u00eentru totul rolului s\u0103u diriguitor.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Acela\u015fi argument \u00eel aducem ca perfect valabil \u015fi pentru situa\u0163ia specificat\u0103 de art.331 CPP.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n            Concluzia care se impune la acest paragraf rezid\u0103 din rolul pasiv \u015fi diriguitor al instan\u0163ei. Categoric suntem \u00eempotriva tendin\u0163ei de a pune pe umerii instan\u0163ei obliga\u0163iile acuz\u0103rii \u015fi\/sau ap\u0103r\u0103rii. Fiecare trebuie s\u0103 \u00eendeplineasc\u0103 con\u015ftiincios sarcinile. Numai astfel se va realiza contradictorialitatea \u00een faza judiciar\u0103 a procesului penal.<\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Aplicarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een faza judiciar\u0103 a procesului penal creeaz\u0103 condi\u0163ii favorabile pentru stabilirea adev\u0103rului \u00een cauza penal\u0103 \u015fi emiterea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti juste \u015fi echitabile. Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere valorile umane supreme care sunt implicate \u00een procesul penal, societatea trebuie s\u0103 pledeze pentru respectarea principiilor fundamentale ale procesului penal \u00een special la faza judiciar\u0103. Dealtfel, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\nRolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii. - Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii. - Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Aplicarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een faza judiciar\u0103 a procesului penal creeaz\u0103 condi\u0163ii favorabile pentru stabilirea adev\u0103rului \u00een cauza penal\u0103 \u015fi emiterea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti juste \u015fi echitabile. Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere valorile umane supreme care sunt implicate \u00een procesul penal, societatea trebuie s\u0103 pledeze pentru respectarea principiilor fundamentale ale procesului penal \u00een special la faza judiciar\u0103. Dealtfel, […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-02-14T10:43:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-09-25T09:54:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"eurointern\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"eurointern\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/\",\"name\":\"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii. - Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-02-14T10:43:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-09-25T09:54:51+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2bf02c24278f4ce807817c8f91add34d\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/\",\"name\":\"Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/\",\"description\":\"Internships\/ Scholarships\/ Grants\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2bf02c24278f4ce807817c8f91add34d\",\"name\":\"eurointern\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ba0ee69eda3e0c9ec9a3c49a6c7a82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ba0ee69eda3e0c9ec9a3c49a6c7a82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"eurointern\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/rubyskynews.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/author\/eurointern28gmail-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii. - Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii. - Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/","og_description":"Aplicarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een faza judiciar\u0103 a procesului penal creeaz\u0103 condi\u0163ii favorabile pentru stabilirea adev\u0103rului \u00een cauza penal\u0103 \u015fi emiterea unei hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u015fti juste \u015fi echitabile. Av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere valorile umane supreme care sunt implicate \u00een procesul penal, societatea trebuie s\u0103 pledeze pentru respectarea principiilor fundamentale ale procesului penal \u00een special la faza judiciar\u0103. Dealtfel, […]","og_url":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/","og_site_name":"Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/","article_published_time":"2011-02-14T10:43:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-09-25T09:54:51+00:00","author":"eurointern","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"eurointern","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/","url":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/","name":"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii. - Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-02-14T10:43:00+00:00","dateModified":"2020-09-25T09:54:51+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2bf02c24278f4ce807817c8f91add34d"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/14\/rolul-instantei-de-judecata-la-3\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rolul instan\u0163ei de judecat\u0103 la realizarea principiului contradictorialit\u0103\u0163ii."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/","name":"Jobs\/ Internships\/ Scholarships\/","description":"Internships\/ Scholarships\/ Grants","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/2bf02c24278f4ce807817c8f91add34d","name":"eurointern","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ba0ee69eda3e0c9ec9a3c49a6c7a82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4ba0ee69eda3e0c9ec9a3c49a6c7a82b?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"eurointern"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/rubyskynews.com"],"url":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/author\/eurointern28gmail-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29333"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29333\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rubyskynews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}